April 2008


white chucks

Cultural phenomena often defy definitive placement. Hunter S. Thompson wore white lo-top converse throughout most of his adult life; my father wore them throughout his high school basketball career; I wore them while meandering around Europe on my version of what has become the American college student’s cultural right of passage. What do we have here: counter-culture, conservative-culture, present-culture(?); my father hated Hunter S. Thompson (not the individual, per se, but what the individual represented); I worshiped Hunter for some years; Hunter, most likely, would have derisively yet lovingly reviled us both (that is, if he could have been bothered by those of us who, for the most part, walk the straight and narrow).

Claude Monet said, “I don’t paint what is. I paint what seems.” What I am interested in here is not a plain canvas shoe with a rubber sole, mass produced and available at a plethora of retail stores that know no national boundaries; no, I am not interested in the shoes themselves. What I am interested in is what the shoe signifies. In France, to don a pair of chucks is a glaring status symbol that does not go unnoticed by the massive flux of hip young Parisians boarding the metro on the way to their busy lives (chucks are extremely expensive because they’re an American import). Yet, in the US chucks are most often seen on the lower strata of the population, the strata more responsive to cultural undulations–those who are standing at the epicenter of the underground and at the foreground of burgeoning cultural movements; the more ragged, the more personalized they are, the higher their value soars. Just as in France, a statement is being made. What I am trying to say is, we are examining not the shoe itself, but the content of the shoe, the soul behind the foot on the sole.

 

 

 

Gods and Generals (2003) Directed by  Stephen Lang. Cast: Jeff Daniels, Robert Duvall, Stephen Lang, Mira Sorvino, et al

Gods and Generals centers on the short career of Stonewall Jackson, a hero-martyr of the Confederate States of America. The relatively unknown Stephen Lang, who starred in 1990’s Gettysburg (to which Gods and Generals is a prequel) plays Jackson as an early-Victorian David Koresh prone to spasms of logorrhea. Whether extolling the book of Samuel as a model of effective writing, or, mounted splendidly on horseback, gazing down on his faithful slave/cook and explaining that the War Between the States is in fact a matter of defending the Homeland rather than the unpleasant, moribund institution of slave-ocracy, Jackson perorates with all the clutter and sweep of a tidal wave flattening a beach resort . In this respect, Gods and Generals not only aspires to literacy, but continues the corrupt tradition of American cinema’s representations of slavery. Though cinematic tactics have changed– from DW Griffith’s grand White Supremacist apologetics in Birth of a Nation to the remarkably enlightened planter who frees his slaves and even finds multicultural safe-haven from snide British killers in Mel Gibson’s The Patriot– American film never fails to distort the wages of slavery either in stripes and lacerations or the profits accrued for White Christian capitalists. That tradition continues somewhat altered in films such as Cold Mountain, which exhibits the defining traits of an exceptionalist strand of cinema cleansed of history: in that film slaves are distant figures laboring in the fields, present for less than a minute.

True to his historical counterpart, Lang’s Stonewall is a man aflame with Jesus, a fire that only exacerbates the epic scale of his contradictions. Informed he will be leading Confederate volunteers into battle, Stonewall chastely enjoins his young wife to read Scripture,  an idealizing gesture Lang uses to invoke Gilded Age moral virtue. Yet God, the horizon of all meaning for the general, affords darker martial pleasures as a means of libidinal outlet. Prim as a schoolgirl with the ladies, Stonewall bellows “Kill them all” in the heat of battle, thereby demonstrating that sexual rectitude and ardent patriotism are the private and public expressions of a powerful fundamentalist zeal. Significantly, sentiments concerning home do not extend to the nation as a whole but solely to the Cotton States, Virginia in particular. In a riveting scene a mere half hour into the story Stoney argues passionately for the necessity of the bayonet as the noblest and most apposite weapon against the invading northern army.  Again Lang attempts to complicate and elevate Jackson’s character: such a choice of arms is the outcome of a education in the Classics, an emulation of Thuycididean phalanxes lined up against barbarian hordes.

In one of Gods and Generals’s most startling sequences, Stones gets a finger blown off in his first battle and spends the rest of the carnage yelling, mangled hand lifted elegantly as if waiting for a tray of martinis, while local civil war re-enactors are PG-13ed to death. In another– Ted Turner and Sen. Phil Gramm ’s (R-TX) cameo– dandified southern gentry chortle in Confederate costume while a Texas fancylad sings and claps. That Phil would actually don a CSA uniform indicates his weak grasp of the potential power that visual image might have with certain members of his constituency. Not poor enough to get drafted to go to Vietnam, here Phil takes the opportunity to make it up by grimacing uncomfortably for the camera, girdled in braid and sash.

Yet G&G raises the issue of the Civil War epic as a subgenre, and what shared characteristics unite these kinds of films. DW Griffith’s Birth of a Nation (1915) is some kind of paradigm, though surely there are earlier silents that treat the same set of events. Broadly speaking, BON and G&G share a north-south structure, drifting between domestic tableaux in both regions. Stoney prays at home in Virginia while Mira Sorvino, ensconsed in her parlor in Pepperidge Farms, quotes the kind of longwinded, Swinburnian trash that Mathew Arnold defended in that manifesto of bourgeois aesthetics, Culture and Anarchy. The effect of all this grandiloquence– King James hexameter and late-Romantic narrative verse– is to bleed these scenes of any psychological clarity.  G&G is so baroque, so excessively ornamental, that it becomes virtually impossible to absorb the narrative as history. In this sense the film departs from Birth of a Nation even as it retains Griffith’s Victorian sensibilities. Actors in painstakingly accurate uniforms declaim floridly while rank upon rank of anonymous soldiers fall into the grass. Yet the audience never sees the homes of these soldiers because the film is more concerned with the mysteries of ruling class domesticity than the lives of those who fought on foot. 

Predictably it’s the Irish who work the hardest in this version of the Civil War. Irishness performs the critical function of representing one of the most significant and gendered themes of civil war: brother fighting brother. In keeping with the it-wasn’t-slavery thesis so popular amongst certain revisionists, one Mick remarks on the crushing irony that the Southern Irish are only fighting their Northern countrymen in order to defend their new homes.  Once again, the similarity of this logic to the rhetoric of DHS raises the possibility that G&G is in fact a kind of ideological template for the loose confederation of influence and interests that is the 21st century Right. All of the major features are there: a deep-fried evangelism, parochialism construing itself as patriotism, a psychotic disregard for one’s own moral and ethical contradictions, arrogance, blood-lust.

 

In 1938, a year before Stalin signed a non-aggression pact with Germany, CLR James wrote in his seminal study of Haitian independence, The Black Jacobins:

“In a revolution, when the ceaseless slow accumulation of centuries bursts in volcanic eruption, the meteoric flares and flights above are meaningless chaos and lend themselves to infinite caprice and romanticism unless the observer sees them always as projections of the sub-soil from which they came.”

A romantic enough call to historical materialism in its own right, at least in its imagery, but one that reasserts a fundamental principle of marxist historiography. Infrastructure undergirds superstructure; material conditions determine cultural and political events. That formula seems antiquated now, perhaps, the algebra of another day. Yet the figure sketched by James should interest us because it breaks with a familiar architectural metaphor of classical marxism. 

If our being isn’t a house– if the social, the cultural, the ideological aren’t simply floor topping floor, further and further from the material foundation– then which is the apposite model? In the passage quoted above, James gives us a geological metaphor: the stirring of men and women into action seems seismic and in that sense inexorable, yet there is more here than the collision of the tectonic plates of the classes. To the observer that subterranean clash of forces is visible mainly in “meteoric flares and filghts” which dazzle the senses– a spectacle of effects that threaten to empty the event (“a revolution”) of meaning. 

It occurred to me, while reading anything and everything that Charles Bukowski poetically gave us, that he may just be the end-all, be-all of contemporary culture. Well, that may be extreme, but time and time again, upon re-read after re-read, I am blown away with his savagery, with his ability to find an epicenter with minimal explanation, with his ability to capture the essence of a contemporary moment in a mere moment. Even the band Modest Mouse-a group touted by MTV and indie music snobs alike- have paid homage to him with a song called “Bukowski.” I could go on, but instead I’ll let him speak for himself:

“In This Cage Some Songs Are Born,” from What Matters Most is How Well You Walk Through the Fire 

I write poetry, worry, smile,

laugh

sleep

continue for a while

just like most of us

just like all of us;

sometimes I want to hug all

Mankind on earth

and say,

god damn all this that they’ve brought down

upon us,

we are brave and good

even though we are selfish

and dill each other and

kill ourselves,

we are the people

born to kill and die and weep in dark rooms

and love in dark rooms,

and wait, and

wait and wait and wait.

we are the people.

we are nothing

more.

 

Iraq has become the other scene of American life, a kind of geopolitical limbo that exists beyond the horizon of intelligibility, at least for those Americans who manage to breach the cocoon of their everyday lives. Surfacing from our mediatized narcosis we gaze past the computer screen out the window onto the street and imagine what it would be like to see our neighbors screaming and bleeding on the pavement, to feel the buildings shake from heavy weapons fire. Later, as we go slack in the moment before sleep, we brush against the fantasy of the door snapped off its hinges and half a dozen bellowing, armed men crashing into the room kicking over the furniture. Or not. It’s tempting to succumb to the vague conviction that nobody knows what anybody else is thinking, that the apparent apathy and disconnectedness of acquaintances and passersby regarding the US occupation of Iraq and its larger imperial project of dominating the “dark corners of the world” (as one of El Busho’s speechwriters once phrased it) is endemic, generalized, the symptom of a cultural zombification which could only be interrupted by some cataclysmic event. 

The kids who still watch television have a reservoir of selected and approved images, bytes and clips to draw from whenever Iraq enters the conversation. The dead boy’s mother jabbering incoherently; the American soldier– lean or beefy, tall or of middling height, padded with gear, gloved, booted, helmeted– virtually erased as a person by his equipment; the sprightly dignitary, girdled with kevlar, smiling, palpably thrilled to be in the midst of well-trained, purposive men and women whose destinies, directly or indirectly, he shapes. 

Six years gone and the Iraq War image-system has expanded into a minor constellation:  from the obscene abstractions of policy makers and pundits and technocrats concretized in ink– the print cacophony of position and rebuttal and counterposition and reiteration– to pixilated YouTube “videos” of resistance operations: the odd US soldier dropped by a sniper, another humvee buckling from an IED blast, a man in a keffiyeh firing an RPG. There is a surplus of such signs and messages, and they have become so ubiquitous they no longer encourage reflection but function as a somewhat interesting yet insubstantial scrim against which we live our lives.

Meanwhile the occupation and its strange inchoate politics, their mass mediation, proceeds according to a principle by which what is revealed remains hidden– airstrike, kidnapping closed-door meeting. New “actors” emerge: “militias” morph into “criminal gangs”; the Sunni-Shia narrative, which was always an intentionally and dangerously stupid oversimplification, fragments and coalesces. Nobody really knows what’s happening, possibly those who are in Iraq least of all. 

And here, in the US, New Babylon, where we are permitted to see parts of the world in order to ensure we remain insulated from it, “the dogs,” as Auden observes, “go on with their doggy life and the torturer’s horse/ Scratches its innocent behind on a tree.”

 

I’ve run across a plethora of youtube posts with a variation on the title of “Fun in Iraq.” Most are trivial pranks, such as tipping a porta-potty over while one of their comrades is indisposed. This one, however, shows prisoners of war as part of an ironic music video montage. Welcome to Contemporary Culture.

We—you, me, and everyone else—are bifurcated subjects: the subject that speaks and the subject that is spoken of, which creates a largely unknowable breach in the Self that we are all constantly attempting to define, whether we are conscious of that search or not; this breach is the unconscious, the gray fuzzy center of what we are at our core. I believe that musicians, and artists in general, attempt to rectify, to understand this gap through their chosen medium of expression: their art form. This is an extremely personal journey and people are drawn to the type of music that embodies the journey that is most like their own. This attraction is based on many factors that, I believe, stem from a certain element of alienation that is endemic of and intrinsic to contemporary culture in particular and can partially be traced to the steaming pile of horse shit that we call the media. As like people gravitate towards like journeys, they begin to congregate, to coalesce and this is the point at which a “scene” begins to develop. To put this in the terminology preferred by Catherine Belsey, music interpellates people as they attempt to construct themselves into cohesive units, which is a variegated system of communication (both within and outside of the barriers of language) that can be diagramed as follows:

                        TRADITION – - – ARTIST- – - – MUSIC – - – - AUDIENCE.

Which is to say, an artist draws upon his/her experiences and the fundamental historicized legacies that comprise them, distills them into a song as a form of catharsis, then shares that cathartic creation with his/her audience who in turn reap the benefits of their own catharsis by identifying with that journey and being surrounded by people who are reaping the same benefits.

At a point, the authenticity of this relationship between the artist(s) and the audience is called into question. Once a band is hyped, signed to a major label, and commodified, something is lost; people begin to follow the artist(s) based not upon a genuine connection with their journey, but rather for the “coolness” factor of the associated scene. This is, consequently, the death of any meaningful extraction: it has been co-opted by popular culture and its original intention has been bastardized. Video killed the radio star. The precise location of this bastardization is difficult to pin point and, therefore, is entirely subjective. Personally, once Middle America (the red states) has picked up on an indie rock artist I tend to lose faith in its authenticity, but that’s because I’m an indie music snob.  

Pick three western urban centers: Albuquerque, Phoenix, and El Paso/ Ciudad Juarez. Connected as points on a map (Rand McNally’s road atlas, which identifies itself as an aid for the uses of ‘travelers’ rather than tourists ) they form an isosceles triangle which bounds not only a stretch of such ‘natural’ features as the Rio Grande and the continental divide but the U.S./Mexican border, a topographical fact blended with a political fiction that emphasizes the dividedness of this slice of what United States citizens call the Southwest . This designation immediately evokes one of the most obvious border problematics: the U.S. Southwest is Mexico’s ‘Northwest,’ specifically the state of Chihuahua, that expanse of low desert which functioned as a permeable geographical limit of the Mexican Revolution, an event documented and archived in the a local museum in downtown Ciudad Juarez. Yet acknowledging this difference in (national) perspective is only the easiest observation to make about the (historical and spatial) contingency of regional formation. Even before Pancho Villa’s army, revered and despised on both sides, rode from Chihuahua into Texas, before Jack Reed’s romanticizing dispatches– the reportorial complement of U.S. counter-incursions into Mexico proper– before Pershing’s cavalry arrived,  this vague space of violent contact had already been reconfigured by the Treaty of Guadeloupe Hidalgo in 1848. Make this date a horizon, recognizing the fact that indidgenous peoples engaged in millenia of cultural production prior to this event.

The three desert metropoles chosen unravel in all directions, loose and wide-gapped. In Albuquerque, real and faux adobe blunts the edges of commercial tourism in Old Town, the city’s original center which has morphed into a cluster of boutiques and restaurants. The historical core of contemporary Albuquerque, Old Town is no longer the site of legendary forms of pre- and emerging  industrial labor (nor the relations these modes of production entail): tanning, smithing, mining. Today, segregated from the rest of the city where the real business of everyday life transpires, Old Town stages the sale of curios to tourists in sunglasses and the work performed is customer service. Underpaid cashiers sell western-themed kitsch, and hybridized knockoffs of expropriated Zuni, Hopi, and Navajo artifacts– miniature dream-catchers to hang on your rearview mirror, T shirts embroidered with beads, turquoise and silver jewelry– at outsider prices. 

The town that once existed there, however, and its web of social relations, subsist, echoed in the distinctively drab adobe and a scattering of weathered implements that signify the American West: wagon wheels, rusted pitchforks, etc. Thus Old Town functions in paradox. Visible, the ‘authentic’ Albuquerque, the preserved history of the contemporary city, and thus its shadow, a ghost relegated to the west end of Central Avenue, displayed for and consumed by tourists, Old Town seems largely irrelevant to locals. Such irrelevance stems in part from its peculiarly privileged position within Albuquerque’s larger economy, one which incorporates more real (though no less imaginary) commercial pursuits. The real Albuquerque, grouped along the length of Central Avenue, includes both brokers manipulating invisible shares via internet and the workers of the underground economy– panderers, prostitutes, dealers, and the police employed to control them.  My point here is that even as Old Town claims to be the authentic Albuquerque, the strip– Central Avenue, which is, importantly, also the historic Route 66– constitutes the real Albuquerque of the popular imaginary. Here we find junky punk rockers bumming spare change and smokes, UNM students milling in coffeeshops, migrants looking for work, and Spanish descended New Mexican teenagers trawling the street in tricked-out hoopties. And it is this latter movement– adolescents cruising along Central,  looking for something to do, performing a set of identities for others with bass-heavy stereos and customized cars– that we begin to see that Albuquerque, as a location, depends on a constant back and forth flux.

Phoenix, like all of these cities, is the epicenter of explosive construction. On any given day in the heat, carpenters, day laborers, and heating and cooling techs perform their designated chores among one another’s clatter. Phoenix could be a model for what urban planners ought never do; unlike Albuquerque, whose growth is somewhat impeded by federally protected petroglyphs to the west, Phoenix knows no bounds. The city continues to ripple outward, encompassing vast tracts of arid land, enclosing a space whose exterior no one seems to think will diminish. At the very core of Phoenix lie massive financial towers. Housed in sheetglass monoliths, the ganglia of the major American banking institutions– Wells Fargo, among others– are centered here, due primarily to Arizonaís lax fiduciary laws which allow banks to charge near-usurious fees. Yet it is at the margins of the city that we see a principle of motion at work which feeds a Phoenix imaginary; a fantasmatics of violent growth. Like the atomic tests that occurred in the desert triangle we have constructed using Albuquerque, Phoenix, and El Paso/ Ciudad Juarez as critical points, Phoenix takes the form of a rapidly burgeoning bubble, a superheated domain whose limits always move outward. As an ever-expanding metropole, then, and as a prominent nexus of national and global capital received and redirected in multiple directions, Phoenix’s motion resembles the bulge of a nuclear blast.

El Paso/Ciudad Juarez, by contrast, functions as a valve for transnational capital and labor. An urban center bifurcated physically by U.S. and Mexican RSAs as well as the Rio Grande, EP/CJ post-9/11, Year Zero of the newly amplified national security state, has been transformed into a wound in the norteamericano body, scabbed over with the hardware of surveillance cameras, fencing, and armed agents (DEA, La Migra, the military, local cops). In October 2006 over a thousand people gathered on the Mexican side to attend the first Border Social Forum in the wake of US Congressional approval of a 700 mile series of border walls. In many ways Juarez itself seems to be the laboratory of a dystopian future: narcotics-fueled gang violence, the serial-killing of scores of young female Maquilladora workers, grotesque disparities between the rich and the poor. Yet the city and its mlitarized northern sister is also a point of social contact which produces hybrid identities and cross-cultural forms. Avenidas de las Americas, the bridge that spans the border, is both conduit and site, perennially choked with pedestrian and automotive traffic, like a convenience store open 24-7. Here tourists and travelers can buy screens to affix to their windows and block out the sun, cold drinks, ‘native’ artwork, and maps. Those who sell such goods are routinely chased from the ‘American’ side of the bridge should they venture too close. 

 

All of the trajectories thus far discussed occur along a horizontal axis. Within our desert triangle, however, we witness another motion which instead runs vertically. The area described is dotted with missile silos, some of which have been decommissioned and opened as tourist sites. Several old Titan bases are open to tourists who may descend to a subterranean complex under the protection of a guide who will emphasize repeatedly that ‘this was not a first strike facility,’ thus rendering the space benign. Rotating crews manned the site well into the 1980s; while one shift monitored the equipment deep underground, off duty personnel lived in base housing on the surface. In the event of  a launch, the silo exits would be sealed and its missiles released. Those still above ground would be considered as good as dead. The surviving crew was provided with thirty days’ worth of supplies after which they would have to choose whether to remain underground and starve or to emerge to take their chances in the irradiated desert.